HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Important questions

Important questions

posted on Nov 03, 2007 06:49AM

I suggest we do not call any spin out company Ring of Fire. I always felt this related to issues best dealt with by the liberal application of Preparation H. The name could cause serious downward pressure on the stock price.

Might I suggest, Ring of Former Liquid Magma Aggregate Organization. Stock ticker ROFLMAO.

But seriously folks, "Important Questions" seem to be thinly veiled steath bashing. It is happening regularly on the UC board. Oops, thinly veiled spammin. NOT really. I have 15 others stocks besides these two.

Here's an example of a stealth bash for you, in my opinion.

Polylabel: "depends on proving up a resource, tonnage, quality" Are you serious? Resource was found over 5 years ago, other companies have hit VMS already including 10 occurences by certain group. Quality? What, that glory hole and other near glories not enough for you. Friggin yikes.

Tonnage is only question in my little mind and the drills are a-turnin. As Tardiff says, a fair bit pretty sure already.

"No doubt there will be burnt fingers because DE type finds come along very rarely" What the heck does this sentence mean? We have found DE. It exists. Get it? Perhaps this person is referring to the other area plays hitting similiar deposits, but the comment seems to be written to suggest we won't find what we already have found. Repeat, already have found! Reminds me of a V-8 commercial.

Miskealp rolled up a newspaper and whacked this doggies nose. Well there's another whack for ya, Poly.

Speakin of doggies that need their nose whacked, Koven at the post is next. There have been different takes on this article, but personally, I am wondering where these "journalists" did their learnin. Torn between being enraged and amused. I am glad that I am able to get input from some of the best, brightest and bravest minds in the country on junior mining stocks on this and other boards and not have to colour my decisions based on the pissant scribblings of this character.

"Nemis was an anonymous, unremarkable till DE" Oh, did you miss Windfall glory hole? This was "unremarkable?"

"Early stage is a gross understatement, only 17 holes, yadda yadda" Well, with way less than this number released yet, every major in the world is kickin the tires, Gang of McKewan et al, pony up, Sprott, Pinetree, PP's oversubscribed, massive volumes on anything within a half hour flight etc. I suppose this is unremarkable as well.

"Do the next issue at $10. Last one at $.60" This is worse than a cheap shot and not worthy of high school yearbook reporter. Koven should be ashamed. Apologies to any high school reporters. I am sure your journalism skills are better and more ethical.

Perhaps someone knows a journalism perfessor that could research the McFaulds story and that article and weigh in on it. I'm no brain sturgeon, but I once accidently left a pickerel in a cooler for a couple weeks in the summer and it smelled better than that piece of rubbish.

The James Bay story, is, my opinion only, very real.

There, I feel better now.

The Trucker

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply