HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Broken record here...

Recall I complemented you on the nature of your ability to think out of the box, so to speak, but on this one look at the massive volume of BMK (many miles from DE in any diresction and then look at the one you mention (Many, many more miles away to the south and well out of the 'Ring of Fire'). They are in a completely different Geological Environment way down south of the McFaulds.

With MJ prognosticating lately you must know that only the Manipulators would be so bold as to make such hugh and irrelevent distant connections.

Just to help some here out I have pasted in some of the questions MJ has NOT even attempted to address lately. Read it and some of his post history on here and on the BMK forum and see what you come up with. Likely better connected conclusions.

Old Joe

PS: The post from a couple of days ago.

 

Re: National Post article - has anyone seen this - MJ

Posted by: Old Joe on November 05, 2007 04:34PM
In response to: Re: National Post article -... by MiningJunkie

Fact of the matter is last month (late Sept. early Oct.) they had it right!
Now, WHAT has changed?
What is it that actually caused you to filp?
Who is it you were defending in late Sept. that you felt needed to be given a break for being more than just asleep at his wheel?
Who are these people you curry favour from?
In summary, Who are you're Big 4?
Who was it that slaped you back in line?
All the above after your challenge in mid to late Sept. restraining your profound enthusiasm!
Some answers please!
Old Joe
PS: Excuses are NOT answers

 
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply