My thought on this, given the discussion over the weekend and the apparent initial interpretation in early September is that the Groung Geophysics at that time suggrsted the Dip was to the West South West. The Plunge was at that time 'yet to be determined'. After Hole #4 and then Holes #16,17,18, the Massive Sulphides were toward the South west and Plunging. Hole # 19 hints at the Massive Supphides channels may have separated. Hole #3 is interpreted to have undercut the mineralization.

Thus, a tentative interpretation could go like this: The very general orientation is a Dip to the West and or South West with a Plunge to the South West - South South West, widening toward the West -South West around Holes #12,13,16,17,18. And the generalized Strike is South South West down to these holes. From these holes onward there may be a separation in the trending direction of the Massive Sulphides. One channel Plunging strongly to the south and the other Diping to the South West. The Dip may also slide under Hole #4 toward the West or South West on the West side of the mineralization zone.

As for the North to North East: The mineralization may be toping out in the East and they are unsure as to if it may turn and go some distance North before Plunging or Terminating. If it Plunges sharply North then I would hazzart a big guess and say it may do so thward the North West (for haw far - who knows - even assuming that this is even a reasonable possability in the North).

Do not hang me on this, but it is an honest effort to construct a general mental picture of what may (likely or maybe unlikely) be the case. I get a sense that the Host rock has sufficient conductivity to somewhat weaken the signal on the mineralization and thus make clear contrast between them difficult.

Old Joe

PS: A generalized attempt to express the data in plain language - NOT a dissertation!