HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: anomaly 3 or 4

Nov 14, 2007 06:13AM

Nov 14, 2007 06:22AM

It is absolutely essential that NOT starts to step out.

With 2 drills on the property, it makes sense to me to keep one at DE1 and go on to drill here - especially if they have very strong mags here to indicate a good target. I can't imagine that they would drill here without very strong indicators...

People are putting negative interpretations on the drill plan that NOT posted on the website. The naysayers are saying "I told you so - no size", completely ignoring the fact that the diagram indicates that the deposit seems to be increasing at depth - and yes, I am very obviously positive in my thinking that this is the tip of the iceberg. I am wondering if NOT should accompany this with some sort of explanation attached to the image emphasizing this point. Maybe that is too forward??

1
Nov 14, 2007 06:41AM

Nov 14, 2007 06:46AM
3
Nov 14, 2007 06:56AM
3
pw
Nov 14, 2007 07:08AM
1
Nov 14, 2007 07:18AM

Nov 14, 2007 09:55AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply