HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: more sub prime information...insight

Hi Stratopod

Just a question.  Do you find the TA numbers really work with NOT?  I know they probably should..but I just can't see speculative stocks being that easy to time.  I guess if your talking on a daily trader type of basis, but more mid to long term the numbers seem irrelevant.  I truthfully have not been following them at all....ok I lied... I did in the beginning.

I guess another question to follow up the first?  Do you find NOT to follow the TA numbers better now that it has done its initial jump?  It does seem to have a cylce its staying in which would point to TA being more accurate to follow. 

Just wondering.  I bought more NOT with the intention of holding long.  Like anyone else if it doubles in the next couple of months I might like to take some profit, put it into cash and wait for a correction to buy back in and increase my core holdings.  Nothing wrong with increasing one's holdings in a great stock like NOT.  Either way the money that is locked in will not be moving from this play. I would like to see the shares grow more though over time.  :)

Have a great weekend,

MM

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply