Re: Why $400 per share may still be low...

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

donypee

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 32261 [?]

Votes: 494 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Why $400 per share may still be low...

in response to

Re: Why $400 per share may still be low...

glorieux

posted on Dec 29, 2007 04:29PM

glorieux,

I wish I wasn't here to answer that question.

Yes your numbers do hold up "all things being equal" but unfortunately, as we all know, they are not.

So although, in a perfect world those are my numbers, in this imperfect world, at this point in time mind you, I would cut down 1/3. This is where my head is at. This is what I feel the long term potential is.