HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Can some one explain this to me?
2
Jan 04, 2008 04:44AM
2
Jan 04, 2008 04:50AM
1
Jan 04, 2008 05:26AM
1
Jan 04, 2008 06:09AM
2
Jan 04, 2008 06:16AM
3
Jan 04, 2008 06:21AM
2
Jan 04, 2008 06:23AM
3
Luk
Jan 04, 2008 07:41AM
2
Jan 04, 2008 08:45AM

I asked this on the Mc Faulds site, but maybe some one here has a good answer.

Based on the general belief being reflected by most, companies like Canacord believe NOT is fully priced. We know by what NOT’s people elude to, that NOT’s present value is, let’s say, ‘fair’, based on known tonnage(although there is no official reserve #).

How come than companies like BMK are up 1000%(approx) and FNC up 800%(approx) since NOT’s discovery with out one stitch of ore proven up relating to NOT’s find. I know you are going to say they have, potential, speculation, etc, but so does NOT. So why does NOT, not have potential, speculation, etc build in for increasing their ore size?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply