HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: 2008... Rundle - "Canaccord's Morning Dishwater"
45
Jan 04, 2008 08:45AM
2
Jan 04, 2008 09:11AM
2
Jan 04, 2008 09:19AM
3
Jan 04, 2008 09:35AM
6
Jan 04, 2008 10:24AM
3
Jan 04, 2008 05:17PM

Re: 2008... Rundle - "Canaccord's Morning Dishwater"

in response to by
posted on Jan 05, 2008 08:05AM

Well, in response to your question about the comments by Canaccord concerning NOT in their so-called "Morning Coffee", it seems to that they are saying pretty much nothing original or of value.

Its a straddle the fence type of discourse engineered to be fuzzy and create doubt, whilst not being strong enough in either its postive or negative sentiments or views to be interpreted as erroneous once we know more....

Its says nothing really... It gives summary and then says the deposit may or may not be big:

"Geologically the potential for this system to continue over a considerable distance is possible, but these recent results may be suggesting that the current area of concentration has limited size."

Seriously, what is the value of this?? It is true, but it tells us nothing we don't already know, and its very craftily worded.

Consider the phrase "suggesting that the current area of concentration has limited size." Either the person(s) who wrote this is incredibly stupid, or its a poor attempt at trying to be cleverly deceptive. Think about the ambiguous nature and the circular logic of that statement...

Any area of concentration is going to have limited size - nothing except, perhaps, time or even the universe, depending on the consistency of one's logic on those topics,  is unlimited. And the "current area of concentration" is by defintion limited to the area in which they are concentrating... I am getting a little dizzy from all these circles. Also, let's not forget the double qualification "may be suggesting".

Absolute horsepoop... Need I say more??

Regards,

B.

 

 

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply