HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: BMK
BMK
18
Jan 11, 2008 01:23PM
2
Jan 11, 2008 01:29PM
2
Jan 11, 2008 01:37PM
20
Jan 11, 2008 01:47PM
6
Jan 11, 2008 02:07PM
2
Jan 11, 2008 02:08PM
8
Jan 11, 2008 02:38PM
2
Jan 11, 2008 02:45PM
4
Jan 11, 2008 02:47PM
5
Jan 11, 2008 02:49PM
3
Jan 11, 2008 03:07PM

Jan 11, 2008 03:08PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 03:11PM
6
Jan 11, 2008 03:22PM
11
Jan 11, 2008 06:41PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 08:32PM
1
HSS
Jan 11, 2008 10:26PM

Re: BMK

in response to by
posted on Jan 11, 2008 11:30PM

Very good info Rosehill&Rundle, very much appreciated and thanks for the effort. Keep'em coming!

About the recent postings "BMK vs NOT" may I add that at some point a certain degree of competition between companies is healthy.

It keeps the firms vigilant concerning a lot of things (their work... results...SP value...)

But in the end it is not about who is number one, two, three,.....

Certainly not at DE. The 're too many companies staking each and every one many claims. Every DE player has the possibilty of a, huge, strike. And every hit made by an individual player will add up in the total. That we know, the geology of the region has been acurately described in numerous posts by very qualified posters.

Eventually when results (estimates, tonnage...) are, slowly but surely, becoming a fact, they will have to work together, if they want to move the big players in, wether it is for a buy out or for a joint mining activity.

And most of the companies have already that connection through their management.

Helium

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply