HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: On another note...Lance/rundle
15
Jan 17, 2008 06:50AM
1
Jan 17, 2008 07:32AM
6
Jan 17, 2008 07:47AM
5
Jan 17, 2008 08:09AM
2
Jan 17, 2008 08:12AM
4
Jan 17, 2008 08:26AM
27
Jan 17, 2008 08:58AM
1
Jan 17, 2008 03:29PM

Hi Don,

One hit wonder?....there has been more and more concerns about the size of the deposit being smaller or referered to as a pencil suggesting that some had concerns the ore body is not as big as first thought. The question was an attempt to put it to rest. In other words to get feedback to all posters from those who are really in the know to provide their knowledge on this subject. JD put it down well in an early post which should help those who may be in doubt.

Regarding the Big Score....I have mentioned this to show what the potential return opportunity is for us with NOT and it was not to be taken in any other way shape or form. I have not idea why you would suggest the rip off comments.

I am courious about the hype around my questions? I can see that one needs to be very careful about what they comment on here.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply