Here are some facts to ponder.

1)Most people here are upset about JF Tardiff and John Emery.

2) Sprott owned 11% of NOT(13-14M shares) on Jan 03, according to JF telling Howard Green.Share priced closed Jan 03 at $4.14.

3) Emery appears on BNN Jan 09.Share price closed Jan09 at $3.72.

 4) Someone(sorry cannot remember who) posted in the last couple of days.Sprott owns 3%(Approx 4 M shares).

5)From Jan 03 to Jan 31 Sprott sold approx 9-10 M shares. During this time the share price remained mostly below $4.00.

6)Why did Sprott sell all/most of these shares below $4.00, only to buy back in at $4.00, other than the Warrants?

I  too was miffed at the way they downplayed Not.

But I just do Not understand their reasoning for doing what they did, unless they have learned something, that we are not privy too.

Any thoughts??

RR