Re: MGR: FWR: NOT Partners??jimmied

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

donypee

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 32261 [?]

Votes: 494 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: MGR: FWR: NOT Partners??jimmied

in response to

Re: MGR: FWR: NOT Partners?

jimmied

posted on Mar 18, 2008 10:16AM

I warmed you all up with my Windfall posts yesterday!

I have posted on several occasions that NOT optioned just the lower end of Windfall. Also last fall I believe it was that NOT hit some more gold at Windfall and I was surprised they were drilling there. I am having trouble finding that info now.

If this were a partnership or something of that sort, why would they be waiting for some info from the site????? Don't you think they would have the info required for an agreement like that?

Why can't it be a mega hit with shallow drills? FWR traded for several minutes after the Halt this AM. That tells me that they received a call!

If it was a partnership FWR would have been aware and would have halted at the same time.