likely that NOT is taking a different approach than when they were defining DE1.  They wanted to show grade consistency and to ascertain some kind of resource initially.  I remember some posters wanted them to "anomaly hop" to show what was in the others.  Since we've proven a consistency within one anomaly, and since it is considered very likely that it is part of one system, then the next step is to "anomaly hop" so to speak to now prove possible extent of this system.  This is where it get very sexy and I can't imagine much else that would electrify the mining community.