I don't see not providing an assay result within days as sitting on news. For example, Richard, and I believe Niel, have told us they may have to do in-fill holes for the 43-101. We all know more or less what E1 already looks like so what difference does it make to publish the result if these infill holes, none? We all know in this one anomaly, believed by some to be on the boarder of FNC, NOT drilled 4 fairly shallow holes, and got nothing. We don't know why. Because NOT management hasn't provided us with their notes of the meeting where the decision to drill these hole was made, does this mean news is being held back? Not to start another round on this issue, but for those conspiracy types here is my question for you. If Richard wanted to teach some one over at FNC a lesson, what would the lesson have been if after 1 meter of over burden NOT drilled 130 meters of massive and semi massive sulphide's? Who than would have had the lesson.