HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: PGE Assays
31
Apr 22, 2008 07:59PM

Re: PGE Assays

in response to by
posted on Apr 22, 2008 08:16PM

Hey Millsy, Just a thought reading your post: The assay results for both PGE (except Rhodium, iridium, Rhutenium, osmium) and base metals have always been at the same time, correct? Now, Neil Novak is telling us that we should get assays back this week for base metals ie Nickel and copper and in 2 more weeks for PGEs...has anyone found it unusual that we are not getting reports at the same time this time??? Again PGEs where at their highest values in E1 when found in Brecia sulfides. In E2, we have 3 out of 4 holes hitting Brecia sulfides. Could our numbers for PGE be so high that they were sent to a second lab for retest?? is this the reason for the delay between base metal assays and PGE assays???

Any thoughts on this guys and girls would be appreciated???

Glorieux

16
Apr 22, 2008 08:52PM
7
Apr 22, 2008 09:24PM
6
Apr 23, 2008 04:33AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply