My take on the above is that most of it pertains to the 2007 drill program and as I noted yesterday Hole #5 sample NEVER saw the Toronto lab. The procedures at the Toronto Lab are not those referred to in this NR. This NR is about the work done in Vancouver and TBay. I would agree that Ms. Armstrong had better have her insurance paid up but she is the one who found the problems at the Toronto lab using the QC procedures that she put in place for both locations.