I agree with Canseco on this one. Al absolutely says what he wants for his own reasons and often twists the facts for his own reasons. This most recent jibberish just doesn't cut it for anyone that has been around for a while (even just a few months). He falls in line with other bashers when talking about NOT in the sense that they focus on 1 piece of information to try an make it look like the 'norm' or the determining factor for the value of NOT. He does not acknowledge the value at Windfall nor the previousl drill results but rather, totally focusses on the lab problems. Then takes that a distorts it to make it look like RN's fault.

He may be a trader, may or may not Short the stock, but whatever he is/does, he is DEFINITELY worth ignoring.

Jeeper.

God Bless all NOT Shareholders