Sorry, but I would take a much harder line on that type of commentary (attributed to Cantaccord.). To suggest that Noront (amongst others) might commonly engage in selective assaying (please correct me if I did not read it correctly), is to suggest they would potentially try to to hide bad data from a 43-101. So the analyst at this point of history is a long way from providing a balanced or even realistic commentary. And hopefully he would withdraw any such comment or suggestion as applies to NOT. If he wants to write the memoirs of some ancient scalliwags of the bygone days of Bay St., fine, but not at NOT's expense.