Re: What if the Assay's were sent back...

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Dayreaper

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 928 [?]

Votes: 87 Score: 3.7 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: What if the Assay's were sent back...

in response to

What if the Assay's were sent back...

TooHotToHandle

posted on May 02, 2008 09:21AM

IF YOU CONSIDER the QA/QC procedures...

They insert Blanks into the samples for verification on assay results. It would seem obvious that some of those blanks came back positive for mineral content.

That being said, it could result in higher than actual results in these corrupt samples.

Or there was so much minerals, they couldn't calibrate properly after the assays... LOL