Re: CYA????

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Sum4All

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 35765 [?]

Votes: 537 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: CYA????

posted on May 02, 2008 11:16AM

"Yes SGS has admitted that there were/may have been problems but this NR sounds to me like SGS was threatening NOT with a law suit?

Does anyone else read that ?

And I hate to say it but if results were really good would they have looked for anomolies in the results? or did they look because results were not so great?"

And you deduce this because? It would not be NOT that needed to cover hence SGS providing this report to regain credibility. What is it you hate to say? You provide two opposing scenarios though the article,if you read it, is quite clear as to what happened. Which one of your scenarios do you side with? I must say your vagueness is rather confusing. Are you Bull4now or Bear4now.

19 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply