I expect reports to be good simply because of what we have found to date, the understandings of how geology works and the continued optimism of administration. As for the control samples indicating that the readings should have been higher, the question should have come to mind, "higher than what?". This is what we don't know yet. Higher than 1%, 3%, 6%. For this we have to wait and see. In and of itself it is meaningless other than the delay this situation created. I don't know how folks derive that this is somehow significant to a certain expectation on it's own.