Superstar....Yes, let's do be honest........

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

jacki79

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 11730 [?]

Votes: 406 Score: 3.2 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Superstar....Yes, let's do be honest........

posted on May 02, 2008 11:56AM

I'm confused......

In regard to the News Release, you say that it seemed negative to you and that the " SGS Lab feel the assay's were done correctly".

Did you and I read the same NR? I thought it was a very positive commentary on a difficult problem that has now been cleared up.

Quite to the contrary, SGS admits its error: "SGS determined that during the base metals analysis over the 10 day period when the samples were first analysed two breaches to SGS' global analytical quality control program had occurred." The company goes on to note that the errors were in calibration ,and certified reference material and SGS admitted "Both errors were human in nature. This has resulted in the SGS Lab reengineering their Toronto Lab Quality System!