HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Confusion!/BABA
8
May 21, 2008 03:29PM
10
May 21, 2008 03:40PM
15
May 21, 2008 04:15PM
5
May 21, 2008 04:16PM
8
May 21, 2008 04:30PM
19
May 21, 2008 04:32PM
12
May 21, 2008 04:36PM
5
May 21, 2008 04:46PM
16
May 21, 2008 05:06PM
28
May 21, 2008 05:09PM
16
May 21, 2008 06:39PM
4
May 21, 2008 06:58PM
19
May 21, 2008 07:02PM
16
May 21, 2008 07:12PM
10
May 21, 2008 07:23PM
5
May 21, 2008 07:34PM

Hey, Don,

As an example, most of us have a decent idea of grades (although after the super grades at E1, lesser grades may seem disappointing, but in point of fact they're NOT), but there may be a way to tell from the NR and the angles of the holes, etc., something more about tonnage.

I'm certainly not one to be able to read an NR and have confidence in my analysis of same, but my point is there are other ways to skin a cat, and allowing oneself to become confused by the rapid fire posts sure to ensue an NR, is not the way to come to any conclusions.

My strong sense is that many rely on the few in these types of stories. Nothing unusual in that respect with NOT, just the way I've observed it over the years.

I'm just looking forward to the day, and hopefully to a lot of positive pandemonium!

And let's not all forgot (especially those whose stock holdings are heavily weighted in NOT), we have been treated to a heck of a lot of excitement (and for many, a good deal of appreciation), over a period of time when our subsector has absolutely sucked!

2
May 21, 2008 07:42PM
9
May 21, 2008 07:51PM
5
May 21, 2008 07:54PM
10
May 21, 2008 09:15PM
8
May 22, 2008 05:08AM
10
May 22, 2008 06:54AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply