I am enjoying all the debate on the geology of McFauld's. There are millions of compounds possible depending on what ingredients were kicking around at the time and of course what the temperature and pressure was. It's fun to speculate whether it's nickle or cobalt or pge's or iron etc. BK came up with a couple that have not been mentioned. In my opinion there is room on the board for as many geological opinions as we can get.
I particularly enjoyed Quack's transcript of NN's interview. 6.5% Ni over 46m with accompanying 1.5 m of 4 to 5 oz of gold per tonne plus 46 m of 10.5g of palladium per tonne. Does anyone really think that is staying in the ground? I don't think so.
Mike