Re: Good point JD... dony-bentonstocks

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

donypee

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 32261 [?]

Votes: 494 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Good point JD... dony-bentonstocks

in response to

Re: Good point JD... dony-bentonstocks

geoprof

posted on May 27, 2008 02:35PM

Good to see that your confusion is gone now Geo. Thanks for all the help today and it just goes to show you. Here Bentonstocks' father was a GEO. You are a GEO in touch with him on a regular basis. I guess Bentonsocks, should not have used those terms.

So now I am enlightened with the fact that "massive" is an adjective. Well gee, thanks a lot.

Tell me why massive is used in that NR in simple english. Does it not say massive sulfides? If it says Massive sulfides what do they mean? Do massive sulfides hold minerals? More specifically do the massive sulfides in this case allow one to believe this is not bad news? Will you give us that?