Re: Just another opinion…Canesco

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Polylabel

Rank: President [?]

Points: 18518 [?]

Votes: 328 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Just another opinion…Canesco

in response to

Re: Just another opinion…Canesco

BullyBoy

posted on May 30, 2008 09:30AM

Sorry but I don't buy that and feel Canesco is correct.

Assay result on one single core means no rhodium value can be used in calculation of 43-101. That company 'response' indicated they had Rhodium numbers on other cores which where kicked back for reassay so Noront has at least a good idea of what's likely number. They decided not to have the reassay include Rhodium.

Best spin on this would be that resulted in speed up of assays BUT you just can't rule out dud results for Rhodium because if they were good they'd have asked they be done over so could be used in calculation of 43-101.

6 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply