Re: We need a new CEO...Don't think so.
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 13, 2008 05:00AM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Wow, I cannot believe what I'm reading about RN. How could anyone want to replace him ? What he's done for NOT, in the last 9 months is truly an amazing story. I can only hope that I have a bit of the saavy of RN, when I reach 70.
Who put these new execs in place ? RN, that's who. So why would we need a new CEO ? I'll bet that the new guys came to NOT, much in part, due to the fact that RN is, in charge. And this new vision that we keep debating about. Nobody knows for sure what is, but NOT and most likely the PP guys. Just by chance, say it is the chromium that's part of the new vision and NOT the nickel (although they'll take it). Perhaps that was part of the key to the puzzle, in that NR, with the most recent assays.
Replace RN and put in some stuffy, tight lipped big time exec, to run the show ? Please, NO ! Definitely, I will gladly take RN over any one of those types. RN is genuine, he cares about his shareholders, deeply. If you have doubts about that fact, then I suggest talking to him or meeting him, if you haven't already.
And as far as Johnny Cash goes, if they don't play the "Ring of Fire" at the AGM at least twice (as opposed to the two hour loop of the song.....), I will be surely disappointed. Who cares about the stuffy establishment types ? Time for something different, I say !
strato-nemis