HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: The Maps/Geo-Donypee-An Other Addendum
11
Jul 25, 2008 12:45PM
10
Jul 25, 2008 01:19PM
5
Jul 25, 2008 01:28PM
20
Jul 25, 2008 01:46PM
4
Jul 25, 2008 01:53PM
2
Jul 25, 2008 01:56PM
4
Jul 25, 2008 02:13PM

Sorry again, but it is very complicated. One can measure the magnetic susceptibility of individual minerals and their corresponding conductivities in a lab environment. Then one can calculate the same based on their concentrations when combined with other minerals. Then one has to take into consideration the depth to surface. Then one has to consider the line spacing of the surveys. Interpretation of actual geophysical responses from airborne or ground surveys is truly part science and part luck. Hopefully, both are working at the same time to your advantage.

geoprof

2
Jul 25, 2008 03:06PM
8
Jul 25, 2008 03:32PM
16
Jul 25, 2008 04:10PM
6
Jul 25, 2008 04:30PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply