VTEM Versus ATEM

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

bernardho

Rank: President [?]

Points: 5032 [?]

Votes: 178 Score: 3.7 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

VTEM Versus ATEM

in response to

URP NR

jg250027

posted on Jul 30, 2008 09:09AM

Below is URP news in April

...Past exploration on the McFauld's Lake Claims includes an airborne electromagnetic (AEM) and magnetic survey carried out by Spider/KWG in the summer of 2003; ground magnetic and TDEM (time domain electromagnetic) surveys in spring 2004; and a recent AeroTEM survey commissioned by several companies in the area in late 2007. The geophysical surveys independently confirm the presence of several drill-ready EM conductors on the group of claims. The Optionors have provided United Reef with a preliminary interpretation map and data for the 2007 AeroTEM survey results prepared by Scott Hogg & Associates Ltd. as they await a final report....

So far, we have URP and BMK ( last year drills) encounter no results

Hope BMK now has more VTEM info to drill, but their share price went down after the news of drilling announced..