As others have mentioned, B2 is not AT-1...

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Bentonstocks

Rank: President [?]

Points: 6383 [?]

Votes: 291 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

As others have mentioned, B2 is not AT-1...

in response to

DD ON AT-12 AND AT-1, LETS GET AT ER!

yixter

posted on Aug 11, 2008 02:05PM

B2 is reported to be a gravity anomaly 800 metres east of B1. AT-1 is an EM anomaly 600 metres south of E1. B2 is probably just as far south from AT-1, as AT-1 is from E1.

NOT would have announced that B2 was found at AT-1 when they announced B2 - they would have to.

In addition, they still reference AT-2 when mentioning the location of both E2 and B1, so there is no reason to think they would not do the same if B2 was located at or near AT-1.