HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Stating the obvious...

Stating the obvious...

posted on Aug 08, 2008 06:05AM

I am sure you guys realize that if FNC hits, PRB will also move sharply higher given the proximity and the geological setting - FNC's and PRB's claims, and NOT's E1 are all part of the same mineralized system. Therefore, a hit by FNC will be very strong evidence that Cu-Ni sulphides are the cause of the EM anomaly lurking beneath the peridotite on PRB MFW claims.

I would argue that PRB is far from dead money. Unlike BMK, its too close to the action...

I don't even want to think about what will happen if FNC drills into something that is not Cu-Ni sulphides, or something of similar value. I think NOT, FNC, and PRB will be hit hard, NOT will recover, but some of the shine and mysteryy of the McFauld's Lake story will be gone...


Regards,

B.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply