HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Stating the obvious...

I notice the Noront board got a slightly different version than the McFauld's posting, why is that?

Just curious,as I took a lot of flack for my April post titled "VTEM's will be key", and a lot of that ended up being very, very, true.

BTW, the VTEM's I got to see WERE the geologist's VTEM's, not the ones put out in the pamphlets. And they look very different from anything I"ve seen to date.

Just curious why, when NOT is about to have a 43-101, and FNC has yet to drill, why NOT's future value should plummet on the results of another co's failure?

GLTAL

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply