HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: .89 difference btween NOT and FNC - Southend Boy
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
.89 difference btween NOT and FNC
1
southendboy
Aug 29, 2008 10:34AM
Re: .89 difference btween NOT and FNC

southendboy
Aug 29, 2008 10:35AM
Re: .89 difference btween NOT and FNC
2
Junior112
Aug 29, 2008 10:38AM
Re: .89 difference btween NOT and FNC
6
Rosedale
Aug 29, 2008 10:38AM
Re: .89 difference btween NOT and FNC - Southend Boy
1
MISFIT1
Aug 29, 2008 10:39AM
Re: .89 difference btween NOT and FNC THANK GUYS!
1
southendboy
Aug 29, 2008 10:42AM

THis is true Misfit. At it's highest price, NOT was values at $963 million whereas FNC was valued at $86 at it's speculative high. This is a factor of over 11 in market cap. Specualation is running high at FNC precisely because they have just started to drill and their proximity to NOTs E1.

Re: .89 difference btween NOT and FNC

rago1
Aug 29, 2008 10:57AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply