HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Why is all of RoF rushing to do VTEM' s?

In that case, if the Cu-Ni-PGM deposits are not to be found under the chromite, is there any sense to deeper drilling the chromite deposits? Probably not worthwhile, if that is the case. What could we expect to find at depth? Perhaps some enlightenment is in order on this matter.

Someone posted a diagram of comparative depths for the Norilsk, Voisey's Bay and McFauld's deposits, and it seemed to portray the RoF as being much further away from the magma chamber as compared to the others, which led me to believe that much deeper drilling would have to be conducted to get at the large deposits.

These are all questions I have, and I'm sure time will answer them all, but I prefer to struggle to understand than leave it all to chance, even if it means I get some things wrong as I pick up info on the way.

Beats arguing about Al, anyways.



GLTAL

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply