Re: Why is all of RoF rushing to do VTEM' s?-Quackaphobe

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

geoprof

Rank: President [?]

Points: 5933 [?]

Votes: 259 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Why is all of RoF rushing to do VTEM' s?-Quackaphobe

in response to

Re: Why is all of RoF rushing to do VTEM' s?

quackaphobe

posted on Sep 02, 2008 11:15AM

No. A geo would not halt drilling by intersection of a single chromite layer. Drilling would continue until the drill intersects a rock type which typically does not host chromite, e.g. granodiorite. Chromite layers may occur as several distinct layers within a single ultramafic host body.