Thanks you for the information geoprof. I see semismart's reponse was also going down the path I was wondering. Would we be better off with FNC hitting nickel/copper or continuing the chromite discovery. I am still confused as to why the value of the chromite is not waking up the market. I know we are still adding to the value of DE1, and DE2 is still going strong. We have so many potential releases of information at this point.

I have no doubt in the potential of NOT and am patiently waiting along with many of you. When I look at the pros vs cons the scale is so one-sided.

Is it possible that because NOT is now a multi-mineral discovey (gold, nickel/copper, chromite...) each one being capable of potential mining. The market is confused as well and can not always differentiate what is good and what is even better? I remember at the luncheon a long time ago a major (I belive it was Vale might be wrong) was sharing the same table side by side quite proudly. Then we knew it as a nickel/copper play and so did they or maybe not. Now one has to ask the question can a major handle this company with 3 possible distict mineral discoveries or are the majors that once cirlced the wagon not sure if they can handle NOT as it continues to grow. I would belive it now being looked at by even bigger majors or maybe NOT has a new structure plan in place accounting for the new management additions.

Just more thought to ponder...

Regards Jay

I am know we have something special here in this company and with the addition of the chromium i guess all levels of investors do not know how to value this company. So the question remains how are they going to 'dumb' this down in layman's terms so we can realize the amazing potential. I wonder if this senerio is kind of president setting or has anyone encountered this situation before.

Regards Jay