HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: News release Windfall 2.34 g/t VS 52.3 ounces/ton

It wasn't made totally clear just what the 'muck' sampling was intended to be applied to. Let's face it they drove a round tunnel into the 'zone' and then took some samples from the ore taken out in this drifting operation, well muck from driving.

Personally I don't think you can take the sample and apply it to the area of mineralization which will be removed/mined because the shaft cut out will be a lot narrower than the access tunnel.

Here's simplified way it's done, they cut up following the mineralized areas. (drill holes/blast and let drop) Will follow up cutting/blasting as they go and minimize taking out rock that isn't mineralized. Get a small miner and you are well under a meter width (unless mineralized area is more than meter wide).

Now compare that one meter (or less width) with the 3 or 4 meter width of access ramp where a lot of the rock isn't mineralized. You'll see that that 3 or 4 grams per tonne changes into 12 to 20 grams awfullly fast.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply