Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - Noront Resources - Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ?

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ?

vila

Dec 19, 2008 01:47PM

Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ?

glorieux

Dec 19, 2008 03:04PM

Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ? / gloriex

vila

Dec 19, 2008 04:26PM

Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ?

rago1

Dec 19, 2008 04:30PM

luker

Rank: President [?]

Points: 45444 [?]

Votes: 245 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ?

in response to

A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ?

vila

posted on Dec 19, 2008 04:31PM

I believe it would be a tad bit more complicated. If for example NOT had a net asset value of 3 times that of FNC, and each company had an equivalent number of outstanding shares, then the 3:1 ratio would be valid. I believe that since NOT has roughly 5 times more shares outstanding than FNC, its net asset value would need to be 15 times that of FNC for the 3:1 ratio to apply, which may very well be the case...time will tell. This seems intuitively correct to me, but I could be wrong.

Disclosure my ROF stock % holdings: 48% NOT, 29% FNC, 23% FWR

Cheers

2 Recommendations

Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ? / luker

vila

Dec 19, 2008 05:58PM

Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ? / luker

luker

Dec 19, 2008 06:14PM

Re: A fair value for NOT...FNC...FWR ? / luker

vila

Dec 19, 2008 06:30PM