Have spent more time going over the interview as well as the many varied posts on this forum. Crazydik posted twice, which is good, and either one of them would definately qualify as the most sensible post of the day. Nothing wrong with most of the others, just his made the most sense to me.

I have also been reviewing previous posts by myself and a few others, comparing the openness of FWR as opposed to our illustrious BOD here.

It has been apparent, and in fact was stated today as policy going forward, that there will be no reporting of visuals, but rather once all information regarding a hole or series of holes is complete, there will be a proper dissemination of news.

I have been very vocal about the difference this policy is compared to FWR, whom have been very forthcoming about any visual indications encountered in their drilling program. Is this correct?

For some history on this subject, I have been playing the junior market for a considerable time, and the first real example of this was when RN started publicizing the visuals from Eage1. I had always thought of this as being a no no as far as the tsx.v exchange was concerned. At any rate this open policy seems to have come to a halt with NOT. Was it voluntary or mandated?

Now looking back at FWR, since the Vancouver conference. The definate indications I got, as well as a few others, was that there were a few more holes completed and the visuals were just as good as previous ones. There would be a news release in a couple of days confirming this. Now it is 3 1/2 weeks later, Mac has had a similar interview, which really told us nothing new, and there is no news regarding visuals.

Perhaps there has been a mandate brought down from the TSX on the subject, first rapping NOT's nuckles as they were the prominent player, and now FWR has been cited also.

Perhaps, also, we can now expect to be treated as most investors in this market have always been treated (and learn to cope with it), like a mushroom.

Regards

K