Maybe I am experiencing some sort of malfunction, but I still see Rosedale's post in the discussion forum.

At any rate, I have no problems with the current board and I believe they are doing a good job of running the company efficiently, and reducing costs - unfortunately, in times like this, AG is an unecessary cost... I would have done the same thing.

In case it was not clear, I fully support the new board in how they are currently running the company. I think many of you should reconsider what you want form BOD in times like this. For me, reducing costs and running the company like a serious mining company are what count most. I do not need them to be nice to me or care about me, or give me 'good news' every other day. Rather, all I need is for them to care about making lots of money by maximizing shareholder value (they are all effectively shareholders), and I have no doubts that is their primary objective. Why the hell else would they be involved?

Regards,

B.