Symbol: NOT:TSX-V
Shares Outstanding: 154,578,457
Fully Diluted: 161,033,457

TORONTO, April 27 /CNW/ - Noront Resources Ltd. ("Noront" or the "Company") (TSX Venture: NOT) is pleased to present the results of preliminary metallurgical studies prepared by SGS Lakefield on chromite mineralization from its Blackbird chromite deposits in the Ring of Fire area of northern Ontario located in the James Bay Lowlands. The studies were undertaken to establish the feasibility of extracting marketable products, not only from the high grade massive chromite beds, but also from lower grade zones diluted by intervening beds of silicate rocks containing disseminated chromite.

                        HIGHLIGHTS of TESTING

-   Massive chromite is amenable to dense media separation (DMS) at (less
    than) 2 mm size fractions. Further testing is planned at the small
    lump and chip size to confirm that direct shipping ores can be
    produced by DMS;
-   Narrow intercalated chromite beds and heavily disseminated chromite
    within ultramafic beds can be combined to produce a high quality
    concentrate using conventional gravity separation;
-   Bench-scale gravity concentration tests provide Cr recoveries of 87%
    on massive chromite, and 80% on a mixture of heavily disseminated
    chromite and intercalated chromite beds;
-   Gravity concentrates grade 51.9 to 53.4% Cr2O3 with Cr:Fe ratios of
    2.2 to 2.4 and SiO2 below 3%, suitable as metallurgical concentrate
    for ferrochrome production;
-   The potential for generation of high value-added products such as
    foundry sands, refractories, or chemical feedstocks by further
    slightly lowering silica contents to below 1% is being investigated
    by continued metallurgical test work.

Mineralization types:

The Blackbird deposit comprises both thick massive beds of chromitite up to several tens of metres thick, and extensive intersections of intercalated chromitite and silicate rocks containing various amounts of disseminated chromite, commonly interbedded on scales of millimetres to metres. The massive chromite beds are of grade and composition comparable to products sold worldwide as direct-shipping lumpy ore (Cr(2)O(3) (greater than) 40%, Cr:Fe (greater than) 1.8). The intercalated material contains narrow beds of the same material that are too narrow to mine separately and therefore would need to be beneficiated in order to recover economically valuable chromite concentrates.

Noront has identified five grade categories of chromite mineralization:
 -  MC is massive chromite ((greater than) 75modal % chromite) occuring
    in beds greater than 4 cm true thickness.
-   D3 includes heavily disseminated chromite ((greater than) 25 modal %
    chromite) hosted by ultramafic silcate rocks.
-   D2 is disseminated chromite ((greater than) 15 modal % chromite).
-   D1 and D are disseminated chromite with greater than or less than 5%
    chromite, respectively. Intercalations of sillicates and chromitite
    beds (less than) 4 cm in true thickness are included in the
    estimation of modal abundance of the disseminated chromite.

Metallurgical study:

We report here the results obtained on two samples chosen to represent the range of medium (D2, D3) to high-grade (MC) mineralization styles present in the Blackbird deposit. Material was obtained by quarter-sawing previously assayed core. One sample (henceforth referred to as massive) comprises 17 m of NQ quarter core continuously sampled through a single bed of massive chromite between 201 and 228 m in drill hole NOT-08-1G017. Another sample (henceforth referred to as intercalated) consists of 15 m of continously sampled NQ quarter core comprising intercalated chromitite beds and heavily disseminated chromite between 190 and 205 m from drill hole NOT-08-065, as well as two one-metre continuous samples of similar NQ quarter core (215 to 216 m and 220 to 221 m) from the same hole. Only 51% of the intercalated chromitite sample consisted of massive beds; the remainder was interbedded D2 and D3 disseminated (32%) and D+D1 disseminated (16%).

Three types of separation were investigated by SGS Lakefield. Results are summarized in Table 1. After stage crushing to -10 mesh the +20 mesh size fraction (+841 / -2000 mm) was treated with heavy liquids (HLS) to simulate the process of dense media separation (DMS). In the intercalated chromitite sample the recovery in the sink fraction at SG of 3.3 was 88.7% of the Cr content of the initial sample, resulting in an upgrading from 35.1% Cr(2)O(3) to 42.1% Cr(2)O(3). No significant change was observed in the grade of the massive chromite during heavy liquid separation.

Magnetic separation was performed after further pulverizing to -48 mesh on the +200 mesh size fraction (+74 / -300 mm). Low intensity magnetic field was used to remove any magnetite present, followed by a high-intensity step to concentrate the chromite. The intercalated chromitite sample was upgraded from 35.1% to 47.1% Cr(2)O(3) in the high-intensity concentrate while achieving a Cr recovery of 78% and reducing SiO(2) contents from 11.4% to 6.32%. The massive chromite sample was upgraded to 50.1% Cr(2)O(3) with Cr recovery of 81.9% in the high-intensity magnetic concentrate. Material lost to fines was not included in the calculation of Cr recoveries; the reported values are taken over the entire size range below 48 mesh.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Cr
         Cr(2)O(3)   Cr     Fe         SiO(2)   MgO Al(2)O(3)   S  reco-
Material       %      %      %  Cr:Fe      %      %      %     (%)  very
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intercalated
 chromite
 (head)     35.1   24.0   12.0   2.00   11.2   18.8   10.1   0.06    100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
HLS
 concentrate
 (SG
 (greater than)
 3.3)       42.1   28.8   12.7   2.27   8.51   16.0   10.8   0.04   88.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
high
 magnetic
 flux
 concen-
 trate      47.1   32.2   14.6   2.21   6.32   14.6   10.2   0.01   78.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
gravity
 concen-
 trate      51.9   35.5   16.2   2.19   2.78   11.6   10.8   0.04   80.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massive
 chromite
 (head)     43.7   29.9   13.4    2.2    7.3   14.5   12.0   0.02    100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
HLS
 concentrate
 (SG
 (greater than)
 3.3)       44.1   30.2   14.0   2.16    7.0   14.7   12.7   0.01   96.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
high
 magnetic
 flux
 concen-
 trate      50.1   34.3   14.1   2.43    4.6   12.8   12.6   0.01   83.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
gravity
 concen-
 trate      53.4   36.5   15.2   2.40   2.12   11.3   12.7  1.012   87.6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 1. Head grades and concentrate compositions for two samples of
chromite mineralization.

Gravity separation was done by stage grinding to -70 mesh ((less than) 212 mm) and passing this material over the Wilfley table and the superpanner. The intercalated chromitite sample produced a gravity concentrate grading 51.9% Cr(2)O(3) and 2.78% SiO(2) while providing 80.7% overall Cr recovery. The massive chromite sample produced a gravity concentrate grading 53.4% Cr(2)O(3) and 2.12% SiO(2) while achieving 87.6% Cr recovery.

Discussion of results:

Gravity separation was highly successful, producing material equivalent to high quality metallurgical concentrate at 52% Cr(2)O(3), SiO(2) below 3%, and a Cr:Fe ratio of 2.2 from intercalated chromitite to 2.4 from massive chromite. Continued testwork will be aimed at the production of clean concentrates with SiO(2) below 1% for end-uses such as foundry sands, chemical feedstock, and refractory applications.

The magnetic separation was successful at producing concentrates suitable for pelletizing as a very high quality direct smelter feed in the range from 47 to 50% Cr(2)O(3). However with SiO(2) concentrations in the range 4 - 6% these materials cannot be considered metallurgical concentrates. Ongoing test work is aimed at improving the removal of silica.

The heavy liquid separation was intended to be a diagnostic tool to demonstrate the feasibility of sorting massive chromite from disseminated material using dense media. In this regard it was successful, since the particles being separated in this manner are small rock chips comprising many grains of chromite and gangue. The procedure therefore demonstrates clearly that waste can be separated from potential ore using dense media. However the grain size employed was finer than would normally be used in mine-scale DMS plants and therefore the results should be taken only as encouragement that massive material can be sunk to separate it from finely intercalated and disseminated materials requiring further concentration by magnetic or gravity separation. Further work is planned to determine the DMS recoveries of direct shipping massive chromite ore achievable at the chip (+1 / -6 mm), small lump (+6 / -25 mm), and lump size range (+15 / -80 mm).

The Blackbird deposit contains, in addition to extensive massive beds of chromitite, very large volumes of intercalated thin chromitite beds and weakly to strongly disseminated chromite. The dilulted grades estimated by averaging the intercalated beds appear to be low, and show Cr:Fe ratios that are affected by the presence of iron-rich silicate gangue within the diluted average grades. The present test results demonstrate unequivocally that high grade products can be generated from both kinds of mineralization using conventional low-cost methods of DMS and gravity separation, and show that the Cr(2)O(3) and Cr:Fe content of the extractable chromite is much higher than would be suggested by the diluted values reported over low-grade intersections.

Joseph Hamilton, Co-Chief Executive Officer states that "These metallurgical results are an excellent preliminary start, demonstrating that Noront's chromite discoveries not only have the potential to be world class, but are high grade and of desirable quality, giving Noront the flexibility to produce a range of chromite materials for a wide variety of end-users. We look forward to finalizing our metallurgical testing."

This press release has been reviewed and approved for dissemination by Noront's senior management including John Harvey, P.Eng. Chief Operating Officer, Dr. James Mungall P.Geo., Chief Geologist, and Jim Atkinson, P.Geo. Exploration Manager, all being Qualified Persons under Canadian Securities guidelines.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
"Paul A. Parisotto and Joe Hamilton"
Co-Chief Executive Officers

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation, including predictions, projections and forecasts. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including such things as future business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, expansion, growth of the Company's businesses, operations, plans and with respect to exploration results, the timing and success of exploration activities generally, permitting time lines, government regulation of exploration and mining operations, environmental risks, title disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage, timing and possible outcome of any pending litigation and timing and results of future resource estimates or future economic studies.

Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "planning", "planned", "expects" or "looking forward", "does not expect", "continues", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "potential", "anticipates", "does not anticipate", or "belief", or describes a "goal", or variation of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.

Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material factors and assumptions, including, the result of drilling and exploration activities, that contracted parties provide goods and/or services on the agreed timeframes, that equipment necessary for exploration is available as scheduled and does not incur unforeseen break downs, that no labour shortages or delays are incurred, that plant and equipment function as specified, that no unusual geological or technical problems occur, and that laboratory and other related services are available and perform as contracted. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, future events, conditions, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, prediction, projection, forecast, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the interpretation and actual results of current exploration activities; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of gold; possible variations in grade or recovery rates; failure of equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; the failure of contracted parties to perform; labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of exploration, as well as those factors disclosed in the company's publicly filed documents. Although Noront has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept
responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

%SEDAR: 00003339E