HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: NOT/Cliffs
8
May 06, 2009 02:44AM
15
May 06, 2009 05:06AM
9
May 06, 2009 12:30PM
8
May 06, 2009 12:33PM
6
May 06, 2009 12:37PM
12
May 06, 2009 12:55PM
2
May 06, 2009 01:37PM
7
May 06, 2009 01:58PM
2
May 06, 2009 03:27PM

It may happen that a critical mass of Cr is found long before a critical mass of Ni, with the possibility that both will ultimately be found. If that happens, development will most likely be from a non-Ni producer (CLF), with Ni by a secondary developer or as a by-product. While VALE is ideally positioned, so is CLF. Right now, VALE is a lot more interested in getting the price of Ni up than in developing a new mine. Just some thoughts. But CLF could easily leverage a toehold on one or more non-NOT players into an effective controlling position in the ROF. And, their transparency is highly respected.

As to NOT management, the silence is both deafening and a little disconcerting, indicating that they are either "up to something" slightly more than drilling or that they do not have a clear strategy. Stock action indicates the latter in my view. When I see a dog with a muzzle on, I generally assume he has bitten at least one person in the past , who could be the owner(s). If that same attitude is extended to potential strategic partners, we will definitely underperform our potential. And, a CLF could be a winner.

3
May 06, 2009 10:32PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply