..that of course, I can grasp only the general drift of it. I'm sure Hoov and others could more thoroughly dissect it and spoon-feed it back to us, if they are willing..LOL!

Anyways, the reason I'm posting it is we all know that there are diamonds in the general area, but we also know there is a massive discovery of metals, as well as the huge riddle of sorting out where the buried treasure lies.

I think the entire RoF is building their knowledge base daily, but not necessarily sharing it. Why would they? It would be counter-productive.

For example, the Fab Four at BMK keep sewing up large tracts of land everywhere BUT the RoF, ( the latest is the Frotet-Evans greenstone belt on the OTHER side of James Bay in Quebec); but they always reference their acquisitions as bearing resemblance to the RoF deposits. I think they have gleaned an awful lot of understanding and don't want to be late to the sulphide party again. 2nd chances don't come along too often,and I think they may have figured something out. But who really knows? It's not as though they'll be sharing that info anytime soon.

Long story short, there are some interesting points in the article I'd like to post following this one. Lotsa key words like "komatiites" "kimberlites" "chromite" and the comments about older and younger magmatism.

All I know is, this find is significant and everybody involved KNOWS that; simply put, now they have to PROVE it with the drills and that is no simple feat since it is such a complex find.

JMO