"Carefully maintain the resolve to REPLACE this BoD come the next AGM, scheduled for late October. Decisions need be ready to be made by early September."

If I'm not mistaken, the past few AGMs have taken place in June? I muse at the reason for the October date for this year's AGM. Oddly enough a little while ago I was looking around for my package from NOT amongst the others and wondering why I hadn't received one. I wondered why no June AGM. My imagination runs with why this is so. I wonder how votes would have been cast differently this year had it been in June.... I wonder if an Oct. AGM accommodates their agenda.... meaning they'll achieve their goals by this point to either bolster investor confidence .....or it will no longer matter. I wonder if an October AGM signifies a quiet summer for news and a languishing SP. I wonder whether the new CEO will truly perform the functions of the title or is he there to perform another function. I believe that this company and all companies for that matter, operate to serve the top when push comes to shove and we certainly live in that time. There is far too much evidence in this economic time that there is no room for sentiment or loyalty and the playing field holds only winners and losers, therefore for we shareholders, we need to expect NOT and those that manage it, to be accountable and therefore communicative particularly at this point. I don't believe we have been dealt with accordingly regarding company information and in light of where gold is going, I'm particularly displeased with the Windfall treatment. I don't like what seems to be casual statements that it could be sold or JV'd as potential options, though they may well be. I don't buy the trivialization of this find. At the ROF they made a choice to assay in such a way as to minimize the amount of information coming out of the company and , given the current state of affairs, I'm not convinced that it is justifiable. Though their plan may play out to be advantageous, it does not promote good relations and trust which behooves the investor to do what is proper to protect ones interests. It is an investors responsibility to question that which appears to fly in the face of company advancement and it is the BODs position to give reasonable justification for what they are doing with investor money as a result. I am waiting for their justification as they have my money and I'm hoping that it won't take until Oct. before we have satisfactory explanations/results. That would make me and no doubt others increasingly curious. If it still matters in Oct. I will be voting very differently this year. If others vote as I do there may be a serious game of musical chairs as new participants arrive looking for a seat. Let the music begin.

The above statements are my impressions and beliefs given the knowledge I have at this point. My opinions are certainly subject to change given new information, however, my opinion on how investors have been treated will likely remain the same as it is now a matter of past record though I welcome future improvements.