HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Some thoughts on Eagle 1 at least tripling

Here is a little table

Element Nr SW MP E
Potash
19 0,86 63,38° K
Magnesium 12 1,74 650° Mg
Phosphorus 15 1,82 589,5° P
Carbon 6 2,27 3527° C
Silicon 14 2,33 1410° Si
Aluminum 13 2,70 660° Al
Titanium 22 4,51 1668° Ti
Tin 50 5,75 232° Sn
Antimony 51 6,70 630,5° Sb
Chromium 24 7,14 1907° Cr
Zinc 30 7,14 419° Zn
Manganese 25 7,21 1244° Mn
Iron 26 7,87 1538° Fe
Niobium 41 8,57 2470° Nb
Cadmium 48 8,65 321° Cd
Copper 29 8,89 1083° Cu
Cobalt 27 8,90 1490° Co
Nickel 28 8,90 1450° Ni
Molybdenum 42 10,00 2500° Mo
Tantalum 73 11,20 2996° Ta
Lead 82 11,35 328° Pb
Mercury 80 13,55 Hg

Element=element name, Nr=Atomic number, MP=Melting Point in degrees Celcius, SW=Specific Weight in grams per cubic cm, E=Element.

I have sorted the table such that the lightes elements are on top. It would seem to me that you are right, the heaviest elemnts should be at the bottom. Ofcourse in general. Some other circumstances may have caused this to be otherwise but as a first guess this would be correct. Now the good thing is, nickel seems to be one of the heavier elements. Maybe more of it with increasing depth?

Just quick thoughts, not being a geologist.

Good luck to everybody!

VB

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply