The Ghost Bridge terminology has come come up of late with the new found mineralization at depth at E1. It's not a new terminology as this idea has been "floating" around for quite some time and if I am not mistaken this theory has been put forth soon after the original E1 discovery.

If my memory serves me correct the said ghost bridge apearred to run in a NE thru SW direction basically connecting the E1 deposit and the AT11 anomoly (but not limited on either end by these occurances). Please correct me if I am mistaken.

Originally the geophysics utilized were not as "telling" as the currently utilized methods and maybe this ghost bridge notion might hold some credence. We now have some BHEM geophysics at E1 (unfortunately we are not privy to results) and possibly some ZTEM results to support this theory. Does anyone know if NOT has utilized ZTEM at this point? I do know of one other large claim holder in the ROF who I believe is the first have utilized ZTEM for their entire land package in the ROF but again not sure if NOT has used this technology.

Today was certainly an interesting day but quite frankly I was a little disappointed with NOT announcing that "there are no corporate developments or undisclosed material changes involving the Corporation to account for its recent rise in stock price." Having said that, both Kareema's and From Sudbury's posts tonight put a new spin on the release.

Like I said a few posts ago:

It's gettin kinda fun again.

Cheers,

Milsy1