HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Eagle Hill option- you misinterpreted my post, edgy
8
Jul 25, 2009 07:13PM
4
Jul 25, 2009 09:06PM

Re: Eagle Hill option- you misinterpreted my post, edgy

in response to by
posted on Jul 25, 2009 09:25PM

First of all, it appears that you are mixing posts of others in with your response to mine. I never "knocked" Old Joe, and I never will. He may be cantankerous at times, but we are in complete agreement about his knowledge and wisdom. That was another poster that did the "knocking". Just trying to set the record straight.

And I must not have expressed myself well in my post about *relative* concentrations, which was my main point, comparing gold at .03% to nickel at 6% to Chromite at 40%. There have been many posts on this board about gold mining techniques and analysis of what might be applicable to WF. My recollection is that there cannot be an open pit due to environmental concerns. That's one of the main reasons why Noront built the ramp in the first place. So that means following whatever seams can be found. Again, my recollection from the postings on this board is that this is the most expensive form of recovery. Beyond the "visible matrix" that we got a report of on the ramp (with pictures of RN looking right at it), and the initial assay report of the 52oz/ton Au, we know nothing more.

It's pretty obvious that I am frustrated with this situation. It was entirely avoidable.

7
Jul 26, 2009 12:05PM
17
Jul 26, 2009 01:13PM
4
Jul 26, 2009 03:19PM
4
Jul 26, 2009 05:26PM
2
Jul 26, 2009 05:55PM
2
Jul 26, 2009 07:36PM
3
Jul 26, 2009 08:06PM

Jul 26, 2009 09:34PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply