Thanks for the replies on this post.

One thing no one has addressed yet is this comment,

"Also, there was some talk about a requirement for an empty hole for the BHEM survey. In the June 29 release it states that ""Hole NOT-09-048 was drilled beneath the extension of the Eagle One deposit intersected by NOT-08-044 but remained in granodiorite to the bottom of the hole."" If I interpret this correctly, doesn't that mean that this hole (Hole NOT-09-048) could have been used for BHEM - since it wasn't within any sulphides? Again, the location of this hole would provide much needed information for the market.

If my assumption is correct about the potential use of Hole NOT-09-048 for BHEM, could this not be how and why they located a potentiall huge find in Hole NOT-09-49?"

I agree I may be impatient and ask for too much (regarding hole locations, maps, etc.), so I will take flak accordingly. Moving on, the above question is more a curiousity and about myself, and maybe others, learning here.

Any help will do.

WW