I am quite hopeful that what PSman reported (although his post was unfortunately deleted) is fact true. It would be nice to get confirmation, but that's probably all we are going to get for now... unsubstantiated report of drill movement at Eagle 1. We *know* that NOT is in the process of getting deeper capacity drill rigs (two, IIRC) up to Eagle 1.
It would be a WONDERFUL "problem" to have, current drills bottoming out in mineralization... requiring deeper capacity rigs to define the extent. That we have two such beasts on the way speaks volumes about the "problem" and the importance NOT places on defining this resource ASAP. Hopefully others on this board will ply their contacts for confirmation.