HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: hole 45 & Burnhard83 and nevermind Hoov.
44
Aug 05, 2009 10:32PM
8
Aug 05, 2009 11:43PM
4
Aug 05, 2009 11:50PM

MJL
Aug 06, 2009 02:36AM
1
Aug 06, 2009 04:39AM

Let's not dismiss the problem too quickly. Examining the documents, you'll see that hole 08-45 and 09-45 are the SAME hole. Furthermore, the diagram on the website says 08-45 next to the graphic itself, but says 09-45 in the table beside it. The problem persists, in my way of interpreting it: the intercept lengths reported on June 29 and August 5 are very different.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply